Testing.
(This thread is lime btw.)
Hah, if you make a new reply, you can still see the "inappropriate" word.
Hah! You're right.
Huh, does that count as a buig?
I don't consider it to be a bug. It's working as intended.
(2012-10-31, 08:19 PM)Lo. Wrote: [ -> ]Huh, does that count as a buig?
It's not our job to fix buigs.
(2012-11-01, 04:55 AM)Imad Jomaa Wrote: [ -> ]I don't consider it to be a bug. It's working as intended.
Shouldn't it show the censored word to not-OPs and save the original title (not censored) anyways?
(2012-11-01, 05:03 AM)Omar G. Wrote: [ -> ] (2012-11-01, 04:55 AM)Imad Jomaa Wrote: [ -> ]I don't consider it to be a bug. It's working as intended.
Shouldn't it show the censored word to not-OPs and save the original title (not censored) anyways?
The problem that would arise if the censored text is copied over as the title, is that the original title would be lost in subsequent replies. If the administrator decided to turn the word filter off, the original post's title would be corrected accordingly, but the titles for the subsequent responses would remain filtered.
Yeah, I assume we are as good as it currently works.
lime lime lime.
orange.
Still testing.