2017-08-24, 11:57 PM
Go back, re-read what I said.
I said you should be caching with an SSD; which had you had the knowledge, you’d know what that means: loading off the disk minimising CPU use.
Depending on how you configure your caching, depends on how much CPU you consume. Then it’s not even running through PHP; so having “10-15 plugins” is a moot point. You won’t get “1000k (1m) views” in a second. That’s... quite a lot. And if you are getting 1m views a second you should be on dedicated hardware.
So, yes - I am recommending him a cost-effective solution. I sysadmin for a living - I know how to minimise CPU cycles. I ran a successful website off a Raspberry Pi B once.
I’m not interested in betting. I have better things to do with my time than measure my parts in comparison to yours.
I said you should be caching with an SSD; which had you had the knowledge, you’d know what that means: loading off the disk minimising CPU use.
Depending on how you configure your caching, depends on how much CPU you consume. Then it’s not even running through PHP; so having “10-15 plugins” is a moot point. You won’t get “1000k (1m) views” in a second. That’s... quite a lot. And if you are getting 1m views a second you should be on dedicated hardware.
So, yes - I am recommending him a cost-effective solution. I sysadmin for a living - I know how to minimise CPU cycles. I ran a successful website off a Raspberry Pi B once.
I’m not interested in betting. I have better things to do with my time than measure my parts in comparison to yours.