GIF has a limitation of 255 (or 256?) colours, and only supports one colour transparency. PNG supports up to 48bit colour with a full alpha channel for transparency.
I use PNG for transparent images(duh), and give for images that don't need to be transparent - it's common sense.
(2009-02-24, 03:22 AM)Tom Loveric Wrote: [ -> ]I use PNG for transparent images(duh), and give for images that don't need to be transparent - it's common sense.
You mean GIF? Not give..
(2009-02-24, 03:24 AM)atomicj Wrote: [ -> ] (2009-02-24, 03:22 AM)Tom Loveric Wrote: [ -> ]I use PNG for transparent images(duh), and give for images that don't need to be transparent - it's common sense.
You mean GIF? Not give..
Yeah, sorry.
(2009-02-24, 03:18 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ]give up gif
png for life
Only problem is he wasn't animation which requires gif
.
.mng image format?
If only it was better supported. Animation of GIF, quality of PNG...
IMO MNG/APNG have horrible compression. If people want web animated formats, they should really use video compression technologies for them, not just serve a bunch of still frames >_>.
Still, I'd prefer it over GIFs. Having more than 256 colors is nice when you're using a monitor that supports more than 256 colors.
I suppose you could use some JS trickery to display different png images in the same element very quickly to make a pseudo animated png.