Ew. The background looks horrible, the relflection on the logo looks like some 2005 web 2.0 banner, the font on the calender, help, search, and members buttons look awful. Also the thread and posts buttons are way too big, and the globes for post indicators are ugly and out of place.
0/10
(2010-05-13, 08:15 AM)edjca Wrote: [ -> ]Ew. The background looks horrible, the relflection on the logo looks like some 2005 web 2.0 banner, the font on the calender, help, search, and members buttons look awful. Also the thread and posts buttons are way too big, and the globes for post indicators are ugly and out of place.
0/10
Thanks for the feedback. I really needed this to improve it.
But many people liked it in "Request and Development Section" Preview post.
Thats why I released it.
We all have our own opinion and likes-dislikes.
I am new to this, not a good designer, but I can do better -I think.
Dear Lord... Reminds me of a Geocities site in 1998.
(2010-05-13, 08:15 AM)edjca Wrote: [ -> ]Ew. The background looks horrible, the relflection on the logo looks like some 2005 web 2.0 banner, the font on the calender, help, search, and members buttons look awful. Also the thread and posts buttons are way too big, and the globes for post indicators are ugly and out of place.
0/10
Its not
that bad, 0/10 is like having a theme without any CSS at all. I would probably rate it 4/10, the welcomeblock is pretty good but everything else is a bit sketchy in my opinion.
I think it's quite good, especially for your first theme.
Not bad but I feel that bleak Style
The .menu part is way to bright (The text).
Imo, the colours don't go well together.
In one sentence all I can say about this theme is that its a well planned theme but not well executed.