MyBB Community Forums

Heh, who does it?

I really want to do it...If I had 5 hours.

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=runege...ne&group=0

I want to scream.

Actually... http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http:/...idator/1.1

You were validating it as HTML 4.1, when it's coded using XHTML 1.0 Transitional's standards and the doctype is also XHTML 1.0 Transitional.

I validate my sites whenever it's practical.

(2010-08-12, 11:44 AM)faviouz Wrote: [ -> ]Actually... http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http:/...idator/1.1

You were validating it as HTML 4.1, when it's coded using XHTML 1.0 Transitional's standards and the doctype is also XHTML 1.0 Transitional.

You just saved me 4 hours.

I always validate, even if it's a small website.
But then again, I normally write pretty valid code, so it doesn't take long to fix the 2-3 errors that pop up.

Edit: Holy crap you source is messy..
It makes me want to cry... D:

I validate whenever possible. Unfortunately I have issues on some pages due to the feeds I pull that are not valid HTML/CSS.

If the site you are validating uses templates, its usually not to bad to make corrections. If you have 124 errors, 95% of them may be resolved with 2 corrections to a single template/file if you are lucky.

Errors cascade; one small error could cause a whole load more. Once I fixed 40 errors by changing a very small piece of HTML. Fix the easy things and you'll probably find it's not such a massive job.

xD
Youtube: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3...ator%2F1.1

Tower Gates (My custom blog, root of site): http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&...wer.com%2F.

My wip storywiki: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3...ator%2F1.1

Wow. My sites are actually error FREE?! I wanted to do Facebook's HTML but it kept going to the mobile site. >.<

Add an XHTML 1.0 transitional doctype and only 17 errors left. (though I frown on the transitional doctype it's OK for beginners like yourself)

I do it by the way, I rarely get an error since I code the right way from the beginning.

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=lithiu...ne&group=0