Hmm, I 'spose. This isn't exactly relevant but the saying comes to mind: "Crooks aren't smart."
(2010-09-25, 10:36 AM)pyridine Wrote: [ -> ]Anyone ever hear of encrypting HTML?
http://www.iwebtool.com/html_encrypter
That would require JS to run, Meaning if you encripted part of the footer, It would fall apart without JS, And if you only encript the copyright then more people would remove it by mistake thining they don't need it.
What about people who browse without JS?
(2010-09-25, 05:06 PM)Mark.M Wrote: [ -> ]What about people who browse without JS?
In this day and age, that's irrelevant unless the person's on a WAP browser or something.
Lol! Mark is still browsing without JS? Just modify the engine to allow only what you want sites to see. I'm pretty sure there's a plugin for that.
(2010-09-28, 07:14 AM)Anman Wrote: [ -> ]Lol! Mark is still browsing without JS? Just modify the engine to allow only what you want sites to see. I'm pretty sure there's a plugin for that.
likely but its just so much easier browsing without.
