(2010-11-21, 10:09 PM)Uncontrol Wrote: [ -> ] (2010-11-21, 09:54 PM)Mark.M Wrote: [ -> ]The media loves to exploit who they can for profit. If you go around a major major city and watch tv, you can see like 12 ads, that in some way exploit a female.
I agree, but this isn't the explanation as to why breasts are considered nudity.
Because we are bred to think our bodies are taboo and only to be used in acts of pure lust. So its desire rather then just satisfyingly your ID.
Bred to think our bodies are taboo? You mean raised? As instinct of liking breasts isn't bred out :/.
(2010-11-21, 11:24 PM)Ryon H Wrote: [ -> ]What's the difference between men finding breasts sexually attractive and men finding feet (one of the most common "fetishes") attractive?
Well, for one thing, a fetish is not simply something one finds attractive; you should look up what a fetish is. Secondly, the amount of men who find breasts attractive is like, what, 99%? Obviously I don't have hard facts here but I think there are very few men who feel zero attraction to breasts whatsoever, regardless of size etc. Even the most common fetish is dwarfed by this.
(2010-11-22, 12:06 AM)Alex Smith Wrote: [ -> ]Bred to think our bodies are taboo? You mean raised? As instinct of liking breasts isn't bred out :/.
Reproduction is supposed to be in each persons ID. (Subcounsois)
No its not bred out, but sex is made to be a forbidden taboo that everyone does.
I know what you're trying to say but when you said bred it's like trying to change a dog to become small by only allowing the smaller ones to breed. While things like liking breasts I just don't think it can be bred out. This is why we use conditioning in the modern day to make it taboo
.
Yeah, breeding != social conditioning. Unfortunately modern society seems to be having a hard time finding the line between "sex is taboo" and "sex is a marketing tool waiting to be exploited".
Just check Africa or other countries, natives females do not cover, why?
beacuse they have not that "image" that we have of that part
(2010-11-22, 01:09 AM)Glas Wrote: [ -> ]Just check Africa or other countries, natives females do not cover, why?
beacuse they have not that "image" that we have of that part
They have culture and beliefs, not reliant on computers, phones and so on.
Unfortunately, most countries with modern technology are full of lazy, unemployed fatasses who ditch culture for porn.
(2010-11-22, 01:09 AM)Glas Wrote: [ -> ]Just check Africa or other countries, natives females do not cover, why?
beacuse they have not that "image" that we have of that part
Are you arguing that these cultures do not see breasts as taboo or do not see them as sexual symbols? I'd definitely agree with the former, but I don't see any evidence for the latter.
iBf: Funny that you argue against the hyper-sexualization of women in media and have a Lady Gaga signature/avatar. She's playing the "sex as advertisement" game as much as every other pop star peer of hers.
I don't care for that, I enjoy her music. Listen, not watch.