Posts: 30
Threads: 12
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation:
0
2015-12-28, 02:28 AM
 This user has been denied support.
hi sir how denied access to users who are using vpn / proxy like this:
Posts: 3,063
Threads: 212
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
148
2015-12-28, 09:33 AM
-Ben
Please do not PM me for support. I am looking to be hired for paid services.
You can view my paid services here.
Posts: 30
Threads: 12
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation:
0
2015-12-30, 02:48 AM
 This user has been denied support.
(2015-12-28, 09:33 AM)Ben C Wrote: This plugin might work. http://mods.mybb.com/view/no-proxy-please
You will need to update it for 1.8. See: http://community.mybb.com/thread-75646.html
what if not wearing a plugin? because I too many plugins so that the server was heavy.
Posts: 5,525
Threads: 73
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
582
2015-12-30, 04:42 PM
(2015-12-30, 02:48 AM)Tempe Wrote: (2015-12-28, 09:33 AM)Ben C Wrote: This plugin might work. http://mods.mybb.com/view/no-proxy-please
You will need to update it for 1.8. See: http://community.mybb.com/thread-75646.html
what if not wearing a plugin? because I too many plugins so that the server was heavy.
You can't add a functionality without additional code.. A plugin like this shouldn't make any difference even on terrible servers.
Posts: 30
Threads: 12
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation:
0
2015-12-31, 08:16 AM
 This user has been denied support.
(2015-12-30, 04:42 PM)Destroy666 Wrote: (2015-12-30, 02:48 AM)Tempe Wrote: (2015-12-28, 09:33 AM)Ben C Wrote: This plugin might work. http://mods.mybb.com/view/no-proxy-please
You will need to update it for 1.8. See: http://community.mybb.com/thread-75646.html
what if not wearing a plugin? because I too many plugins so that the server was heavy.
You can't add a functionality without additional code.. A plugin like this shouldn't make any difference even on terrible servers.
ok sir I will try to use the plugin
Posts: 443
Threads: 10
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
41
2015-12-31, 07:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 2015-12-31, 07:31 PM by Rakes.)
 This user has been denied support.
(2015-12-30, 04:42 PM)Destroy666 Wrote: (2015-12-30, 02:48 AM)Tempe Wrote: (2015-12-28, 09:33 AM)Ben C Wrote: This plugin might work. http://mods.mybb.com/view/no-proxy-please
You will need to update it for 1.8. See: http://community.mybb.com/thread-75646.html
what if not wearing a plugin? because I too many plugins so that the server was heavy.
You can't add a functionality without additional code.. A plugin like this shouldn't make any difference even on terrible servers.
It tries to connect to the request's ip twice every... request, how is that not terrible for the server?
This is some horrible advice and to even try to back it up... Wow good job.
OP as that's mine, it's a whole system scanning every ip and stacking them into lists if suspicious for later scanning; and it's not a plugin it uses nginx's deny as that's more lightweight than anything.
Beep Boop
~ RIP Server 2014-2014
Posts: 30
Threads: 12
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation:
0
2015-12-31, 10:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 2015-12-31, 10:39 PM by Tempe.)
 This user has been denied support.
(2015-12-31, 07:25 PM)Rakes Wrote: (2015-12-30, 04:42 PM)Destroy666 Wrote: (2015-12-30, 02:48 AM)Tempe Wrote: (2015-12-28, 09:33 AM)Ben C Wrote: This plugin might work. http://mods.mybb.com/view/no-proxy-please
You will need to update it for 1.8. See: http://community.mybb.com/thread-75646.html
what if not wearing a plugin? because I too many plugins so that the server was heavy.
You can't add a functionality without additional code.. A plugin like this shouldn't make any difference even on terrible servers.
It tries to connect to the request's ip twice every... request, how is that not terrible for the server?
This is some horrible advice and to even try to back it up... Wow good job.
OP as that's mine, it's a whole system scanning every ip and stacking them into lists if suspicious for later scanning; and it's not a plugin it uses nginx's deny as that's more lightweight than anything.
This must wear nginx server?
Posts: 443
Threads: 10
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
41
2015-12-31, 10:49 PM
 This user has been denied support.
(2015-12-31, 10:38 PM)Tempe Wrote: (2015-12-31, 07:25 PM)Rakes Wrote: (2015-12-30, 04:42 PM)Destroy666 Wrote: (2015-12-30, 02:48 AM)Tempe Wrote: (2015-12-28, 09:33 AM)Ben C Wrote: This plugin might work. http://mods.mybb.com/view/no-proxy-please
You will need to update it for 1.8. See: http://community.mybb.com/thread-75646.html
what if not wearing a plugin? because I too many plugins so that the server was heavy.
You can't add a functionality without additional code.. A plugin like this shouldn't make any difference even on terrible servers.
It tries to connect to the request's ip twice every... request, how is that not terrible for the server?
This is some horrible advice and to even try to back it up... Wow good job.
OP as that's mine, it's a whole system scanning every ip and stacking them into lists if suspicious for later scanning; and it's not a plugin it uses nginx's deny as that's more lightweight than anything.
This must wear nginx server?
No it's my own private system and I only share the block files sometimes.
Beep Boop
~ RIP Server 2014-2014
Posts: 5,525
Threads: 73
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
582
2016-01-01, 01:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 2016-01-01, 02:00 AM by Destroy666.)
(2015-12-31, 07:25 PM)Rakes Wrote: It tries to connect to the request's ip twice every... request, how is that not terrible for the server?
This is some horrible advice and to even try to back it up... Wow good job.
Or that's your terrible reading comprehension, because I clearly wrote "A plugin like this" (generally) and I assume you're specifically talking about the 1.6 plugin posted above. You don't need to connect to a remote server if you only require basic headers check, you know. If that's not sufficient and you need better detection, there are also other lighter methods such as blacklist dbs.
Not to mention that he was worried about the amount of plugins used on his forum and I answered accordingly to that, since using 1-3 hook(s) more rather than executing code directly doesn't really matter.
Also, bragging about your private system is definitely more helpful. "Wow good job."
Posts: 443
Threads: 10
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
41
2016-01-01, 03:59 AM
 This user has been denied support.
(2016-01-01, 01:52 AM)Destroy666 Wrote: (2015-12-31, 07:25 PM)Rakes Wrote: It tries to connect to the request's ip twice every... request, how is that not terrible for the server?
This is some horrible advice and to even try to back it up... Wow good job.
Or that's your terrible reading comprehension, because I clearly wrote "A plugin like this" (generally) and I assume you're specifically talking about the 1.6 plugin posted above. You don't need to connect to a remote server if you only require basic headers check, you know. If that's not sufficient and you need better detection, there are also other lighter methods such as blacklist dbs.
Not to mention that he was worried about the amount of plugins used on his forum and I answered accordingly to that, since using 1-3 hook(s) more rather than executing code directly doesn't really matter.
Also, bragging about your private system is definitely more helpful. "Wow good job."
Calm down there buddy no need to get all angry up in here, OP will clearly take the easiest path and use what is thrown at him and the plugin that was thrown at him is horribly expensive to use in which you confirmed that a plugin like such wouldn't make much of a difference; notice his reply to yours, yea good job there.
Problem there is that the code that is executed is quite horrible and without caching and what was said above.
Not bragging but sorry if you feel that way, just pointing it out as many tend to search for it and details on how it works, if you haven't noticed there has been quite many threads about it.
Beep Boop
~ RIP Server 2014-2014
|