2018-07-10, 08:59 PM
(2018-07-10, 08:48 PM)linguist Wrote: I think OP's point was that the issue should not have been one in the first place. Suspending for alleged TOS violations that actually hadn't happened is something that shouldn't happen. Not even in cheap providers. If that happens too regularly, it is not for naught to warn others of such a provider., I think.
That being said: that "you're a cancer" thing should actually be worth a suspension here.
Finally someone who understands the whole purpose of this thread.
And I find it pretty whack that you'd rule an immediate suspension over a warning.