Jump to the post that solved this thread.
Solved: 1 Year, 7 Months, 3 Weeks ago [General] 100% warning doesn't place in banned group?
#1
Solved: 1 Year, 7 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Mistake me if I'm wrong, but if a user reaches 100% warning level, isn't he supposed to be placed in the banned usergroup?

It appears that they are kept in their primary usergroup?

-snip pic-
Reply
#2
Solved: 1 Year, 7 Months, 3 Weeks ago
By default adding warning points doesn't trigger anything. You need to set up warning levels to decide what happens when a user receives warning points.
[Image: banner.png]
Reply
#3
Solved: 1 Year, 7 Months, 3 Weeks ago
(2019-09-05, 07:59 AM)StefanT Wrote: By default adding warning points doesn't trigger anything. You need to set up warning levels to decide what happens when a user receives warning points.

I have just added one for this cause, my mistake for not seeing it. However, it does not seem to function as the user is still not banned:
[Image: 7d5f54faf009d84106ca3252b005a380.png]
Reply
#4
Solved: 1 Year, 7 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Users that have already been warned will not get shifted to the group as the job is triggered on hitting 100%.
Reply
#5
Solved: 1 Year, 7 Months, 3 Weeks ago
(2019-09-05, 08:58 AM)Ben Cousins Wrote: Users that have already been warned will not get shifted to the group as the job is triggered on hitting 100%.

Gotcha. So for now that it is added, it should function as is. Thanks guys
Reply
Jump to the post that solved this thread.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)