(2013-02-19, 05:22 PM)pavemen Wrote: [ -> ]For my sites, MyBB IS the framework! Custom pages and advanced plugins all around for easy integration
Agreed. It's just not in the more modern object oriented MVC form you often see.
I like Where The development has lead to. Mybb2.0 should be on its own aswill.
Only problem with the MyBB 1.x core as it stands in my opinion is the Database classes. MySQL is the only one which works 100% of the time and come PHP 5.5, the mysql_* functions are deprecated.
(2013-02-20, 02:44 PM)Euan T. Wrote: [ -> ]Only problem with the MyBB 1.x core as it stands in my opinion is the Database classes. MySQL is the only one which works 100% of the time and come PHP 5.5, the mysql_* functions are deprecated.
i agree that some major progress needs to be made, such as PDO and embrace whatever the PHP road map lays out over the next several years. (e.g. deprecated mysql_*)
i am still very unsure about basing the code on a third party framework.
(2013-02-20, 04:28 PM)Paul H. Wrote: [ -> ] (2013-02-20, 04:19 PM)pavemen Wrote: [ -> ] (2013-02-20, 02:44 PM)Euan T. Wrote: [ -> ]Only problem with the MyBB 1.x core as it stands in my opinion is the Database classes. MySQL is the only one which works 100% of the time and come PHP 5.5, the mysql_* functions are deprecated.
i agree that some major progress needs to be made, such as PDO and embrace whatever the PHP road map lays out over the next several years. (e.g. deprecated mysql_*)
i am still very unsure about basing the code on a third party framework.
* Paul H. coughs about https://github.com/euantor/MyBB-PDO
Yeah, I need to get around to actually finishing that.
Personally, I don't mind moving to a framework, but I do also like what IPS is doing with IPB 4.0 (
http://community.invisionpower.com/blog/...-suite-40/) in which they are simply upgrading and rewriting what needs rewriting.
True that. I'll see if I can get a start on it this weekend...
(2013-02-20, 09:15 AM)Spudster Wrote: [ -> ]I like Where The development has lead to. Mybb2.0 should be on its own aswill.
Whilst ideal. It slows development, plus, why reinvent the wheel if you can use an already designed one?
(2013-02-20, 08:08 PM)Lo. Wrote: [ -> ]Whilst ideal. It slows development, plus, why reinvent the wheel if you can use an already designed one?
my concerns are dependencies on a third party framework and then the how modular the framework is. if something is not used needed on the app side, then there should be no internal dependencies of the framework for it.
