2009-04-17, 12:46 PM
I think we shouldn't always need to fill in the PM "Subject:" field. And if we don't, it should just say <No Subject>.. I don't see why it always needs to be filled.
(2009-04-17, 01:30 PM)Tom Loveric Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe also show a little snipplet of the message, say x characters, along with the rest of the information. Half of the PMs I get just have a stupid subject anyways, so using the subject to guess the content isn't the easiest thing to do.
(2009-04-17, 10:02 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ]Exactly. I'd atleast like this for certain usergroups.(2009-04-17, 01:30 PM)Tom Loveric Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe also show a little snipplet of the message, say x characters, along with the rest of the information. Half of the PMs I get just have a stupid subject anyways, so using the subject to guess the content isn't the easiest thing to do.
Yeah, this would be cool. I hate having to enter subjects for really short PMs.
(2009-04-17, 10:01 PM)CraKteR Wrote: [ -> ]Do it like Gmail does it. Oh I like it that way!
(2009-04-17, 10:04 PM)Tom Loveric Wrote: [ -> ](2009-04-17, 10:02 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ]Exactly. I'd atleast like this for certain usergroups.(2009-04-17, 01:30 PM)Tom Loveric Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe also show a little snipplet of the message, say x characters, along with the rest of the information. Half of the PMs I get just have a stupid subject anyways, so using the subject to guess the content isn't the easiest thing to do.
Yeah, this would be cool. I hate having to enter subjects for really short PMs.