2010-05-01, 12:58 PM
Matt,
the main problem is consistency and fairness. It is evident that flamewars must be stopped, when they exists after giving at least 2 warnings to the people causing it whoever they are!
Preventive thread closing is too much a question of subjectivity and people without any experience in life can have a lot more difference in their judgment than someone 30 years older than them. The solution are clear rules, because thoses rules can be interpreted in different manners depending who read them:
The "No Flaming" section tell about rudeness, i have honestly to tell you that i have often seen "rudeness" in the way the staff were reacting to some posts, even at the april fools day someone try to make believe that he was 2 other members of the forums this was beyond "rudeness" to me it was totally illegal to impersonate someone else as well in the USA as in Canada. But this is just some example. Like i wrote before, consistency and fairness are the keys here, backed up with clear rules.
The "No Instigating" section have to be clearer also. What if a user try stubornly to make staff understand that they did something wrong? Will he be considered "provoking or inciting"? Will he receive multiple "warnings" before suspensions or can he be suspended right away? Now what if someone is crying at an injustice that he believe to be a a victim of and want to tell other users here about it? Would you consider this to be "provoking or inciting"? Seem that if someone is "dumped" by its girlfriend it is OK here, but if someone is "dumped" by another member it is not OK! Again here, consistency and fairness are important, always backed up with clear rules.
May i suggest that a single moderator can only delete, close or suspend a post/thread when something illegal have been posted and that it need at least 3 staff members including a "head" staff manager to decide of the action to take for other kinds of "misbehaved" posting that are looking to be against the rules before taking action? This could be at least an intermediary solution!
For sure if you allow any user to make fun of each other on some thread without intervention because you do not believe it will degenerate in a flame war, you are in a bad position to intervened in another thread where you believe it will degenerate. Like i wrote before, beeing mature and professionnal will need quite a change in attitude from the users as well as for the staff. I would predict at least 70% less posting on this forum and 50% less active members...
We could debate on this for years, but a good business manager would not need this time to understand that something must be done for the welfare of the project. If he want it to be a fun and ludic project he can go one way but if he want a mature and professionnal project he must go another way.
I realy hope that these principles can be understood with all the secondary actions that must be made to accomplish the desired goal.
In short, if the project is there to please everyone it will fail for sure, if it is there to please a specific audience and kind of people it will be successfull. And when i write successfull i do not mean necessarely about money...
I hope that everyone will try to think about all i wrote and not only try to debate to only keep there own little pleasure spot at MyBB!
Sincerely,
Exdiogene
the main problem is consistency and fairness. It is evident that flamewars must be stopped, when they exists after giving at least 2 warnings to the people causing it whoever they are!
Preventive thread closing is too much a question of subjectivity and people without any experience in life can have a lot more difference in their judgment than someone 30 years older than them. The solution are clear rules, because thoses rules can be interpreted in different manners depending who read them:
MattRogowski Wrote:No Flaming – Rudeness towards other members will not be tolerated. Keep this forum friendly.
No Instigating - We value your opinion and we appreciate your input, however continual provoking or inciting will result in warnings or suspensions.
The "No Flaming" section tell about rudeness, i have honestly to tell you that i have often seen "rudeness" in the way the staff were reacting to some posts, even at the april fools day someone try to make believe that he was 2 other members of the forums this was beyond "rudeness" to me it was totally illegal to impersonate someone else as well in the USA as in Canada. But this is just some example. Like i wrote before, consistency and fairness are the keys here, backed up with clear rules.
The "No Instigating" section have to be clearer also. What if a user try stubornly to make staff understand that they did something wrong? Will he be considered "provoking or inciting"? Will he receive multiple "warnings" before suspensions or can he be suspended right away? Now what if someone is crying at an injustice that he believe to be a a victim of and want to tell other users here about it? Would you consider this to be "provoking or inciting"? Seem that if someone is "dumped" by its girlfriend it is OK here, but if someone is "dumped" by another member it is not OK! Again here, consistency and fairness are important, always backed up with clear rules.
May i suggest that a single moderator can only delete, close or suspend a post/thread when something illegal have been posted and that it need at least 3 staff members including a "head" staff manager to decide of the action to take for other kinds of "misbehaved" posting that are looking to be against the rules before taking action? This could be at least an intermediary solution!
For sure if you allow any user to make fun of each other on some thread without intervention because you do not believe it will degenerate in a flame war, you are in a bad position to intervened in another thread where you believe it will degenerate. Like i wrote before, beeing mature and professionnal will need quite a change in attitude from the users as well as for the staff. I would predict at least 70% less posting on this forum and 50% less active members...
We could debate on this for years, but a good business manager would not need this time to understand that something must be done for the welfare of the project. If he want it to be a fun and ludic project he can go one way but if he want a mature and professionnal project he must go another way.
I realy hope that these principles can be understood with all the secondary actions that must be made to accomplish the desired goal.
In short, if the project is there to please everyone it will fail for sure, if it is there to please a specific audience and kind of people it will be successfull. And when i write successfull i do not mean necessarely about money...
I hope that everyone will try to think about all i wrote and not only try to debate to only keep there own little pleasure spot at MyBB!
Sincerely,
Exdiogene